It was interesting to read an article in BBC titled “Dot brand versus dot com: Internet domains go head to head“. The author claim the brand has superiority over dot com.
As I always claim, it all depends on the angle you look at! Let me tell you some other points here.
Let assume that I want to buy a smart phone. Now if I know the brand I want to buy then I will go directly to their website and do my purchase. That is because the brand has done some off-line or on-line advertisement that made me to be aware of their product. What if I didn’t make up my mind on any particular product?
Will I go to smartPhone.apple or smartPhone.samsung or so to say smartPhone.google?
Definitely I am going type in “Smart Phone” in the address bar as many would do! At this point think about the flow of the search engine. Which link is ideal to bring at the top of the results? Is that smartPhone.com, smartPhone.org, smartPhone.apple, smartPhone.samsung or smartPhone.google? I bet that Google will not jeopardize their search result strategy for petty benefit of bringing dot brand in forefront.
I best bet is the smartPhone.com or the org site is going to show at the top of the search result page as they will have a review of all branded and non branded products. That’s what I was searching for. That would be the relevant result. That is what Google is good at and that’s why they lead the search market.
So, ultimately from the user perspective the open gTLD is much more valueable than the dot brand. The dot brand is good for those big corporates to show off their power of spending and pride to fight each other as the current patent war in courts all over the world. But, will never take the gTLD down as this author claims.
Do you think otherwise? Drop your thoughts below!
